Ethnic Studies: Constructive vs. Liberated
Different Types of Ethnic Studies
It is important to understand that there are different ways to teach Ethnic Studies. This chart presents the contrast between the two types of Ethnic Studies.
Constructive Ethnic Studies focuses on understanding and countering racism, teaching respect for all and the need for social justice. It empowers students to learn about their complex identities and those of others around them, to celebrate the beauty of both diversity and that which is shared by those of different backgrounds. It unites students in empathy rather than divides based on skin color. It presents liberal civil rights figures while also exposing students to the ideas of their critics (e.g., “How did Martin Luther King Jr.’s approach to achieving civil rights differ from Malcolm X’s?”). Constructive ES teaches HOW to think, not WHAT to think.
Below are the key harmful aspects of Critical/Liberated Ethnic Studies (ES).
Divides Students into Victim/Oppressor Boxes (Liberated/Critical ES)
Liberated/Critical ES defines and divides students into victims and oppressors based on the color of their skin. Instead of building bridges, it creates bigger divides by pitting students against each other. It judges people based on skin color, which is the definition of racist. The words of Critical ES proponents demonstrate this:
“whites continue, consciously or unconsciously, to do all in their power to ensure their dominion and maintain their control.” Derrick Bell, The Permanence of Racism
"The oppressors, who oppress, exploit, and rape by virtue of their power, cannot find in this power the strength to liberate either the oppressed or themselves." Paolo Freire, "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" (foundation of Critical ES)
Rather than empowering students of color, Liberated/Critical ES teaches them that they have been, are, and always will be victims. It frames them as devoid of agency altogether, which undermines achievement.
Example from a mom: "My son has wanted to be a lawyer since he was 11. Then one day he came home and told me, “But Mommy, there are these systems put in place that prevent Black people from accomplishing anything.” The Atlantic, The Narrative Is 'You Can't Get Ahead'"
Liberated/Critical ES promotes alienation in multi-ethnic/multi-racial families and communities.
Parent of 10-year-old inter-racial child: Daughter came home from school distraught because her teacher explained that all white people have privilege that is used to oppress black people. The child didn't understand why her dad (who is white) is oppressing her Mom (who is black).
Nevada lawsuit: A Black parent is suing her son's high school over their insistence that her biracial, "white-passing" son address his “White dominance.”
Indoctrinates a Specific, Narrow Ideological Agenda (Liberated/Critical ES)
Critical/Liberated Ethnic Studies inculcates a specific ideology into K-12 schools. This ideology is not simply included in the discussion but is the ideological framework of the curriculum.
The curriculum teaches children WHAT to think, not HOW to think, forcing students to accept a series of narrow assumptions and closing down inquiry by accusing as racist those who question or dig deeper to present countering facts. Students are then told that they must take action against a specific issue in order to be “anti-racist” or “anti-oppression”. Individuals are told what to believe and then are instructed to take specific actions in order to belong.
The curriculum focuses on political agendas and foreign policy rather than centering curriculum around racism and building understanding. Ethnic Studies is not meant to be a political theory class. It should focus on building ethnic understanding and pride in ethnic accomplishments. Rather than "challenge imperialist/colonial hegemonic beliefs" the curriculum should challenge racism and all its causes.
The Liberated ES curriculum teaches that one racial group will always oppress another. It is inevitable according to this ideology.
Liberated ES curriculum frames the United States as an occupied territory and the US government as a colonial power.
Capitalism and “our consumer economy” appear as villains in Critical/Liberated Ethnic Studies, yet Marxists, regardless of their repressive behavior or violent acts, are not. Capitalism is described as a “form of power and oppression,” alongside “patriarchy,” “racism,” “white supremacy” and “ableism.” Communism is benign even when connected to Pol Pot and the Killing Fields.
When asked in teacher trainings about the explicit Marxist concepts, the trainers acknowledge that some teachers may find this difficult, but explain that they must have the “correct political views” in order to teach this subject.
Critical/Liberated ES considers individualism, objectivity, meritocracy to be "characteristics of White Supremacy culture."(equitablemath.org)
The curriculum calls for activism for specific, ideological causes, encouraging teachers “to fly under the radar” as needed to promote these causes.
Example: Curriculum promotes Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which calls for the destruction of Israel. Curriculum also encourages students to volunteer for Arab organizations that also promote destruction of the Jewish state.
Glorifies Militant and/or neo-Marxist Role Models and Movements (Liberated/Critical ES)
Critical/Liberated ES glorifies neo-Marxist and/or violent "role models.” Examples include:
Assata Shakur – engaged in armed struggles against the US and convicted of first degree murder of a police officer
Oscar Lopez Rivera – responsible for over 130 bombings in US cities
Lolita Lebron – led an armed attack the Capitol by firing over 30 bullets into the House chamber
Omitted from studying are seminal civil rights leaders, such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and John Lewis, who are described as “passive” and “docile.” (CA Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum, p. 74 resource.)
Through the use of leading questions and the romanticizing of militant leaders and movements, Critical/Liberated ES encourages students to embrace radical and militant change as the ONLY means for change.
Celebrates Marxist/communist organizations including the Black Panther Party, The Young Lords, The Brown Berets, and I Wor Kuen, while ignoring mainstream civil rights organizations. Instructs teachers that “It is important to emphasize that the work [of these Marxist organizations] was truly amazing, but largely incomplete,” and that “it is [the students’] own reimaginings, visions, and activism that are needed today” (LESMC, “Transformative Solidarity” lesson).
Bill Calls for a Balanced Approach to Ethnic Studies
AB-101, the California Legislature’s bill to make Ethnic Studies a high school graduation requirement, directs local educational agencies NOT to use the material that was rejected from initial ESMC drafts. That rejected, offensive material is currently being advocated by Critical/Liberated activists in their curriculum - a curriculum that is openly based on Draft 1 of the ESMC.
The following amendments were specifically added to ensure that school districts do not adopt and implement rejected drafts of the ESMC and to guarantee transparency to all interested parties (emphasis added):
vi) … it is the intent of the Legislature that local educational agencies not use the portions of the draft model curriculum that were not adopted by the Instructional Quality Commission due to concerns related to bias, bigotry, and discrimination.
(IV) … The proposed course shall first be presented at a public meeting of the governing board of the school district or the governing body of the charter school, and shall not be approved until a subsequent public meeting of the governing board or governing body at which the public has had the opportunity to express its views on the proposed course.
Specific Points
The Critical/Liberated ES curriculum is explicitly based on the initial drafts of the ESMC. The main authors of the Critical/Liberated ES are the same authors that demanded to remove their names after some of their ideological agenda was removed from the final version of the ESMC.
The narrow ideological agenda, as well as harmful biases, of Critical/Liberated ES has been rejected by California’s State Board of Education and should not be implemented by local school districts.
CA legislature has made clear in AB-101 that the rejected material should not be used by school districts.