Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Isn’t Ethnic Studies a good thing?
Absolutely! All students deserve to see themselves in curricula. Ethnic Studies should educate and build understanding, while tackling challenging issues through an analytic lens. But doing so does not require proselytizing a specific ideology. The guiding principles of positive Ethnic Studies courses specifically guard against political indoctrination. Constructive Ethnic Studies curricula include the wrongs of racism and others forms of hatred without romanticizing violence.
What’s the problem with Liberated Ethnic Studies, in a nutshell?
Liberated Ethnic Studies dictates a narrow, politicized ideology, divides students into powerful oppressors and disempowered victims, and elevates violent role models. Much of this content comes from the initial, state-rejected Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum (ESMC) drafts. The Liberated approach, driven by a specific political agenda, rewards ideological regurgitation, prevents open inquiry or critical analysis, and allows discussion only within the narrow confines of its ideology. Click here for examples.
What are the California laws related to Ethnic Studies?
AB 2016 called for the development of an Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum (ESMC). The intent of Ethnic Studies was to empower students and to foster "an appreciation for the contributions of multiple cultures.”
AB 101 mandated public and charter schools require students graduating in 2030 to take a one-semester course in ethnic studies. This law allows for a variety of courses that cover ethnic studies. The law also explicitly guards against politicization of the subject by specifying that the rejected content from Liberated-based ESMC drafts should not be used.
If Liberated curricula are so harmful, how did they come about in the first place?
In reaction to the SBE’s rejection of their ESMC draft, the activists founded their own Liberated group, explicitly to preserve and promote the material and ideological agenda rejected from the ESMC. These activists are currently pushing districts to hire them as consultants to shape local district courses and infuse their content.
The efforts of Liberated consultants directly contradict guidance from the CDE that “The intent of the Legislature is that the course not be based on the early drafts of the state model curriculum that were not adopted by the Instructional Quality Commission.” (Prouty, CDE)
So Liberated Ethnic Studies is NOT about diversity, inclusion, and highlighting the contributions of ethnic groups?
Correct; in fact, according to the Coalition for Liberated Ethnic Studies (CLES), Liberated Ethnic Studies is “not a multiculturalist approach to the teaching of the history of the United States, in which the contributions of minoritized people are highlighted.” Rather, the Liberated coalition sees ES as grounded in political ideology and entirely focused on resistance, oppression, settler colonialism, capitalism, cisheteropatriarchy, etc.
In contrast, effective K-12 ES courses acknowledge many different factors leading to discrimination and racism while exploring a wide range of approaches to bring about positive change. ES should do this, while maintaining the focus on diversity, inclusion, and contributions of ethnic groups. Liberated ES teaches that all US systems are fatally flawed, and encourages a sense of us vs. them. Effective K-12 ES encourages students to call out flaws where they exist and work together to bring about the shared vision of a better future for all.
Is this a left-wing vs. right-wing issue?
Absolutely not; promoting any specific ideology is counter to the purpose of K-12 education, as indicated by the History-Social Science Framework, which guards against teachers promoting a particular viewpoint in the classroom.
Why do Liberated activists say they’re the “experts” on Ethnic Studies?
Ironically, the same Liberated activists that are pushing an agenda contrary to the CDE and legislative intent are claiming to be the “experts.” However, they are experts in a very particular, politicized version of Ethnic Studies (ES) – the version that has proliferated in universities, where ES is an openly politicized subject, and students can opt to take courses that they understand are taught from a very particular viewpoint.
Who decides what qualifies as Ethnic Studies?
According to the CDE: "local educational agencies will determine whether a course satisfies the statute’s requirements." (Thomas Prouty, Deputy General Counsel, CDE) Your district can choose to satisfy these requirements through existing courses or a survey Ethnic Studies course, while ensuring that rejected Liberated content is not included.
Let’s Work Together
Please contact us for any questions, a sample for the full Constructive Ethnic Studies Curriculum, or to discuss professional development opportunities.